Massachusetts voting history
POLLING HISTORY — MASSACHUSETTS

Massachusetts: Presidential Voting 1988–2024

From Dukakis home state to D+33 — America's most reliably blue large state

Presidential Election Results 1988–2024

Year D % R % Winner Margin Context
1988 53.2% 45.4% Dukakis D +7.8 Governor Dukakis wins home state; loses nationally by 7.7
1992 47.5% 29.0% Clinton D +18.5 Perot 22.7% collapses GOP vote; MA margin balloons
1996 61.5% 28.1% Clinton D +33.4 MA delivers Clinton's largest margin; Boston suburbs fully D
2000 59.8% 32.5% Gore D +27.3 Nader 6.4%; MA still +27 for Gore despite Green split
2004 61.9% 36.8% Kerry D +25.1 Sen. Kerry wins home state; MA largest Kerry margin nationally
2008 61.8% 36.0% Obama D +25.8 Obama wave; MA margin consistent; educated suburban surge
2012 60.7% 37.5% Obama D +23.2 Romney was MA governor 2003-07; loses home state by 23
2016 60.0% 32.8% Clinton D +27.2 Anti-Trump college-educated surge; suburban consolidation deepens
2020 65.6% 32.1% Biden D +33.5 Largest MA margin since 1996; anti-Trump college-educated peak
2024 61.2% 36.5% Harris D +24.7 Margin narrows slightly from 2020 peak; still among nation's highest

State Voting Trend Analysis

Massachusetts is the Democratic Party's most reliable large-state partner. It has not voted Republican for president since 1984, when Reagan's 49-state landslide briefly extended even into the deep-blue Northeast. The state's Democratic lean predates modern coalition politics: Massachusetts was the only state to vote for George McGovern in 1972, earning it the famous "Don't Blame Me, I'm From Massachusetts" bumper sticker after Watergate vindicated the anti-war position.

The structural foundations of Massachusetts's Democratic dominance are layered. The Irish-Catholic working class of Boston established a Democratic machine that survived urban decline. Elite universities (Harvard, MIT, Tufts, Boston University, Northeastern, Amherst) produce a constant influx of young, highly educated Democratic voters who frequently remain in the state for careers. The state's large healthcare and biotech sector employs a credentialed professional class that aligns with Democratic policy priorities.

The partisan irony of Massachusetts is that it regularly elects Republican governors — William Weld, Mitt Romney, Charlie Baker — who are ideologically moderate and culturally acceptable to the state's educated electorate. But at the presidential level, no moderate Republican can compete: the cultural and economic distance between the national GOP's base and Massachusetts voters is too great. Mitt Romney losing his own former state by 23 points in 2012 is the definitive data point.

Notable: Romney Effect 2012

Mitt Romney served as Governor of Massachusetts from 2003 to 2007 and signed the state's universal healthcare law (the model for the ACA). Despite this deep local connection, he lost Massachusetts to Obama by 23 points in 2012. The result demonstrated that presidential elections in Massachusetts are not about candidate familiarity but about national party identity — and the national Republican Party is structurally incompatible with Massachusetts voter preferences.

LIVE
Generic Ballot Democrats47.8% Republicans41.1% D+6.7 Trump Approval Approve39% Disapprove58% Senate D47 R53 House D213 R222 Generic Ballot Tracker Trump Approval Senate 2026 House 2026 Latest Analysis